The Blog on Endoscopic Powder

Endoscopic Powder for Haemostasis: A Breakthrough in Minimally Invasive Surgery


Image

Securing haemostasis effectively is essential for positive surgical outcomes. Beyond minimizing intraoperative blood loss, it significantly reduces the risks associated with transfusions and postoperative complications. Yet, minimally invasive surgeries—like laparoscopic and endoscopic interventions—make bleeding control more complex because of restricted maneuverability and visibility.

With the rise of less invasive surgery, adaptable and efficient haemostatic agents are more vital than ever, especially where standard techniques fail.

Why Bleeding Control in MIS is Difficult


Compared to open surgeries, MIS—such as laparoscopic and endoscopic procedures—offers numerous benefits like reduced recovery time and smaller scars. These positive factors, however, increase the complexity of haemostasis. The lack of space, restricted visibility, and absence of tactile cues make diffuse or irregular bleeding especially tough to address.

Traditional methods—sutures, ligation, or electrocautery—are often impractical in these settings. Here, topical haemostats such as endoscopic powders become essential, helping to control bleeding and improve surgical efficiency.

Surgi-ORC® Powder: An Innovative Haemostatic Solution


One of the most promising powdered forms—a plant-based, absorbable haemostat with a proven safety and efficacy profile. Introduced decades ago as a sheet, oxidized regenerated cellulose (ORC) is now available in powder form for today’s MIS challenges.

Key Benefits of Surgi-ORC® Endoscopic Powder


• Fast Bleeding Control: ORC speeds up clotting by promoting platelet adhesion
• Adaptable Coverage: Powdered ORC easily conforms to irregular or deep wound areas
• Plant-Derived and Safe: No animal or human materials, so lower immune or infection risk
• Antibacterial Action: Acidic pH helps kill bacteria at the wound site
• Biodegradable and Safe: Powder is absorbed with no toxicity, even near sensitive structures

Thanks to these features, Surgi-ORC® powder excels at controlling bleeding from small vessels in restricted surgical fields.

Delivery Devices: Enhancing Precision in MIS


The choice of delivery device plays a major role in the powder’s performance during MIS. Bellows pump applicators are commonly used for precise powder placement in minimally invasive settings.

How Bellows Applicators Function


Bellows applicators, which look like syringes, have various tip lengths for applying powder via laparoscopic ports. By manually compressing the bellows, surgeons can apply a consistent amount of haemostatic agent directly onto the bleeding site without obstructing the surgical view.

Key Considerations for Optimal Use


• Orientation: How you hold the device (vertically or horizontally) influences powder distribution more than how hard you squeeze
• Powder Properties: The grain size and flowability, plus moisture sensitivity, impact delivery
• Operator Technique: Delivery efficiency varies based on how quickly and forcefully the bellows are compressed [5]

Real-World Applications of Endoscopic Powder


In surgical settings where access is limited or structures are delicate, endoscopic powder proves invaluable. Its adaptability allows direct application to large, raw surfaces or narrow anatomical crevices.

Typical Applications:

• Minimally invasive liver surgeries
• Cardiothoracic MIS cases
• Gynaecologic laparoscopic procedures
• Submucosal dissection cases
• Minimally invasive urology surgeries

Using endoscopic powder helps surgeons see better, stop bleeding quicker, and complete operations faster—often with less need for transfusions and better patient outcomes.

Clinical Evidence: Proven Performance of ORC Powder


A postmarket clinical study evaluating SURGICEL® Powder (ORC-based haemostatic agent) in 103 patients undergoing various surgical procedures reported:

• 87.4% of patients had bleeding stopped in 5 minutes; 92.2% within 10 minutes
• Excellent results across open and minimally invasive surgeries
• No complications such as rebleeding, thromboembolism, or side effects reported
• Surgeons found it easy to use, highly effective, and praised the precise delivery with little extra intervention needed

Overall, the data shows SURGICEL® Powder as a safe, effective, and adaptable haemostatic agent—especially when conventional tools aren’t enough.

Summary


As MIS continues to evolve, so does the demand for advanced haemostatic tools. ORC-based endoscopic powders offer surgeons rapid, flexible, and reliable bleeding control options.

No matter the complexity—be it confined spaces, delicate organs, or irregular wounds—ORC endoscopic powder ensures safe, effective bleeding control for today’s surgical demands.

References


1. Zhang Y, Song D, Huang H, Liang Z, Liu H, Huang Y, Zhong C, Ye G. Minimally invasive hemostatic materials: tackling a dilemma of fluidity and adhesion by photopolymerization in situ. Scientific Reports. 2017 Nov 10;7(1):15250.

2. De la Torre RA, Bachman SL, Wheeler AA, Bartow KN, Scott JS. Hemostasis and hemostatic agents in minimally invasive surgery. Surgery. 2007 Oct 1;142(4):S39-45.

3. Al-Attar N, de Jonge E, Kocharian R, Ilie B, Barnett E, Berrevoet F. Safety and hemostatic effectiveness of SURGICEL® powder in mild and moderate intraoperative bleeding. Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis. 2023 Jul;29:10760296231190376.

4. Xiao X, Wu Z. A narrative review of different hemostatic materials in emergency treatment of trauma. Emerg Med Int. 2022;2022: 6023261

5. Stark M, Wang AY, Corrigan B, Woldu HG, Azizighannad S, Cipolla G, Kocharian R, De Leon H. Comparative analyses of the hemostatic efficacy and surgical device performance of powdered oxidized regenerated cellulose Endoscopic Powder and starch-based powder formulations. Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis. 2025 Jan 1;9(1):102668.

6. Bustamante-Balén M, Plumé G. Role of hemostatic powders in the endoscopic management of gastrointestinal bleeding. World Journal of Gastrointestinal Pathophysiology. 2014 Aug 15;5(3):284.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *